Red Light Cameras Get Rethought As Revenue Drops

With revenue dropping and their effectiveness in crash prevention questioned, towns ask if red-light cameras are worth it.

CHICAGO (AP) – Some municipal officials in Illinois are rethinking the use of red-light cameras as the number of tickets drop and groups question whether the cameras are effective in reducing crashes.

The Chicago suburb of Bellwood, for example, brought in $1.1 million from motorists caught on camera running lights during the program’s peak in 2008. This year, officials say net revenues are near $250,000.

The Chicago Tribune reports that some officials tout that as proof that the red-light cameras are making streets safer. But University of Illinois adjunct professor Rajiv Shah says he’s studied the effectiveness of such cameras in Chicago and found that they don’t nab the type of violators who cause the most serious crashes.

The Tribune reports that some municipalities have decided against red-light cameras due to community opposition.

(Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

  • Larry

    They have zero to do with safety and everything to do with filling coffers. They’re ALL OVER the City of Chicago. And they’re a scam. End of story.

    As to the article, why mention this Shah guy without mentioning what his findings were? Shoddy reporting.

  • Dale

    I think cameras have a lot to do with safety as well as improving efficiency of traffic enforcement. I like that they create an awareness in drivers, which I think is lacking today.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Daily Weather Reports Delivered To You!SIGN UP NOW: Get daily weather reports every morning from meteorologist Steve Baskerville!
CBS Sports Radio RoundupGet your latest sports talk from across the country.

Listen Live