Audit: City Failed To Track, Replace Sick Trees

CHICAGO (WBBM) — A 2-1/2 year audit, timed to coincide with Arbor Day, found that the City of Chicago may have lost nearly $500,000 by failing to track which of its newly-planted trees were ailing, and seeking replacements.

As WBBM Newsradio 780’s Bob Roberts reports, the tree-planting program has been one of Mayor Richard M. Daley’s pet projects. In all, the city planted approximately 14,675 trees during the period audited, although the audit found the numbers impossible to reconcile with planting firms’ invoices.

LISTEN: Newsradio 780’s Bob Roberts reports

The contracts with each of its three tree suppliers specify that the city is to get free replacements, should the trees die or begin to fail within two years.

City Inspector General Joseph Ferguson said his audit found only 107 trees were replaced for free.

When WBBM 780 asked Ferguson if it is possible that hundreds of trees were purchased as replacements, he said, “It is, but the city paid for these trees. They paid for the planting of lots of trees. They paid for a guarantee to have failing trees replaced and they couldn’t track what trees they had in the field and what trees were actually replaced.”

Ferguson said the tracking system the Dept. of Streets and Sanitation’s Bureau of Forestry used to determine the dates when and locations where trees were planted was incompatible with the software used for customer service requests to 311.

The audit found 685 more trees planted than the number recorded by suppliers.

That troubled Ferguson, who wrote in the audit that the guarantees must be tracked “in order to ensure the agreements are properly enforced and to avoid waste of funds by paying for trees that should have fallen under the guarantee.”

Ferguson said the audit prompted the Bureau of Forestry to resolve the compatibility issues, and said the number of trees replaced in recent months under the guarantees reflects the 5 percent death rate his office projected.

Ferguson calls the 5 percent figure “conservative,” and said studies elsewhere of urban tree planting show failure rates as high as 50 percent. At 5 percent, Ferguson said the potential loss to taxpayers was $481,641.

The audit found that there has been little tracking done as city budget cuts have taken their toll on the Bureau of Forestry and the department as a whole. Ferguson recommends that Bureau of Forestry workers resume a physical review of recently-planted trees during the course of trimming and wants supplier invoices reconciled monthly.

  • tom Sharp

    What a stunner: another patronage-filled city agency not doing its job and costing the taxpayers money! Is this chapter covered in da Mayor’s “Legacy Book”?

  • Jim

    The City loves to plant trees with no thought if where they are planting the tree is good for the tree or the spot they are planting it in. Half the trees on my block and the school down the street are dying because they have been planted to close to each other, never trimed or maintained. We can never get the City to come out and trim trees. The only time we see them out to take care of a tree is after a storm when big branches fall and are in the street. God help you if you are a home owner with roots in your sewer system. It takes an act of God to get the tree removed and in the end you have to hire the contractor to remove the tree. Yes, the City loves to plant trees. Maybe they should have a forestry department able to keep up with what they plant.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Daily Weather Reports Delivered To You!SIGN UP NOW: Get daily weather reports every morning from meteorologist Steve Baskerville!
CBS Sports Radio RoundupGet your latest sports talk from across the country.

Listen Live