Move Advances To Lift Ban On Recording Police Officers

CHICAGO (CBS) — When police misconduct is caught on tape, it’s a big deal, and there could much more taping going on in Illinois.

As WBBM Newsradio’s Dave Dahl reports, currently, it is forbidden under state law to make an audio recording of police officers doing their jobs in public.

But new proposed legislation would change that.

LISTEN: WBBM Newsradio’s Dave Dahl reports

HB 3944 would not eliminate the Illinois Eavesdropping Act altogether, but would eliminate the part of the law that now prohibits “the recording of a peace officer who is performing a public duty in a public place and speaking at a volume audible to the unassisted human ear.”

A House committee approved the bill 9-2 Wednesday, sending it to the House floor for further action.

Currently, someone who records a police officer, prosecutor or any other member of the law enforcement community without his or her permission can be charged with a Class 1 felony.

Robert Loeb, representing the Illinois State Bar Association, testified in favor of the new bill.
“When the eavesdropping law was originally passed decades ago, we had very limited means of communication compared to today, when we’ve got people carrying cell phones – cell phones with cameras, cell phones with video cameras, with sound capability, GPS capability,” he said.

State Rep. Elaine Nekritz (D-Northbrook) is sponsoring the bill, saying it protects citizens who pull out cell phones or turn on a camera to record events they witness. She says it is important to update the law because international visitors and journalists are coming to Chicago for the NATO and G8 summits in May.

The upcoming summits sparked concern from both opponents and supporters. The events are guaranteed to attract throngs of journalists and protesters.

“Thousands of journalists and people are at risk for prosecution,” Nekritz said.

Police interests have come out against any amendment in the eavesdropping law, saying the changes will impede their investigative powers.

But Chicago Police Supt. Garry McCarthy has come out in favor of changing the eavesdropping law. He said it is just as bad for the police as it is for citizens.

As a police official in New York and New Jersey, McCarthy found it helpful to record officers politely, but firmly, informing protesters that if they did not end their protest, they would be arrested. That prevented brutality suits against his officers, he said.

McCarthy last month that he planned to use the same approach with the Occupy Chicago protesters. But if Illinois still bans audio-recording of arrests, that complicates his plans.

“I actually am a person who endorses video and audio recording,” he said. “There’s no arguments when you can look at a videotape and see what happened.”

Multiple people have been arrested and have faced serious charges for recording officers.

In August of last year, Taiwanda Moore, 20, was acquitted of a felony violation of the act, after she secretly recorded two police Internal Affairs officers while filing a sexual harassment complaint against a third officer.

Moore had said she didn’t know about the Eavesdropping Act, but her attorney argued that she was protected under an exemption to the statute that allows such recordings if someone believes a crime is being committed or is about to be committed. She argued that the officers had been stalling and bullying her.

No action was ever taken against any of the officers.

Meanwhile, artist Chris Drew is awaiting trial on charges of violating the Eavesdropping Act when he was arrested in December 2009 for peddling his art without a permit on State Street downtown.

Drew was charged with videotaping his own arrest, and faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted.

And in November of last year, Loyola journalism professor Ralph Braseth was taken into custody after videotaping the arrest of a teenage boy who jumped the turnstile at the Chicago Avenue Red Line subway stop. Breseth had been shooting for a documentary about youth from poor neighborhoods flooding the downtown area on weekends.

Braseth was released without charges, but the arresting officer erased the files on his Kodak flip camera. He later filed a complaint against the officer, claiming that videotaping an arrest from the distance was different from recording a conversation and thus did not violate the Eavesdropping Act.

The Sun-Times Media Wire contributed to this report.

(TM and © Copyright 2012 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS Radio and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2012 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)

  • WetNurse

    Good! The police should have nothing to fear with this change if they themselves are acting in a lawful manner. Their job is to enforce the law, that doesn’t make them above it.

  • Rick

    They should have waited until after waves of criminals converge on Chicago for the NATO/G8 summits. The police will need every advantage to deal with the impending crime wave that will certainly occur.

    • Ben Watson

      and by wave of criminals you mean the summit goers, right? The international bankers, their puppets, and their army of storm troopers that will be employed to protect them.

  • Chivi

    “it is forbidden to record police officers doing their job in PUBLIC!!”” Public public public!! Isn’t this violating our constitutional rights?? Public. Not inside their homes. PUBLIC!!! More will lose their jobs!! Stop walking on water CPOs. Big tax payers are watching!!!

  • RJ

    I favor this change. If the police have no misbehavior to hide, they should have no objections to being filmed.

  • Pamala E.

    Yes, it is public recording but it’s still a source of aggravation. Most of us aren’t interested in finding ourselves posted on You Tube for making a simple arrest or traffic stop. I had a guy film me unnecessarily after he was issued a parking ticket he felt was unfair.

    • Ben Watson

      Awww too bad, get over it. The Bill of Rights is more important than you feeling aggravated over being videotaped in public. You have a tax payer funded position and tax payers have the right to keep tabs on you and talk about how you carry out your duties on youtube. If you’re not comfortable with that than find another profession.

  • Chicago ‘Eavesdropping’ Act Under Scrutiny « West Denver Copwatch

    […] were approved 9-2 by the House committee, “sending it to the House floor for further action” (Chi CBS Local). One public defender speaking out against in defense of clients being prosecuted for allegedly […]

blog comments powered by Disqus
Daily Weather Reports Delivered To You!SIGN UP NOW: Get daily weather reports every morning from meteorologist Steve Baskerville!
CBS Sports Radio RoundupGet your latest sports talk from across the country.

Listen Live