Judge Rules Against State’s Ban On Recording Police Officers

CHICAGO (CBS) — A judge on Friday tossed out the controversial Illinois eavesdropping law, which makes it a crime to record police officers, according to a published report.

Criminal Court Judge Stanley Sacks ruled that the Illinois Eavesdropping Act criminalizes “wholly innocent conduct,” and thus is unconstitutional, CBS 2 reports.

LISTEN: WBBM Newsradio’s John Cody reports

The ruling comes in the case of artist Chris Drew, who had been charged of violating the Eavesdropping Act when he was arrested in December 2009 for peddling his art without a permit on State Street downtown.

Drew was charged with videotaping his own arrest, and faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted.

Drew’s attorney, Mark Weinberg, said his client was ecstatic, but frustrated.

“It was a two-year ordeal, and as somebody said, there’s little joy in justice, because the taste of injustice is still in your mouth,” he said.

But the battle against the Eavesdropping Act is not over. A parallel case is under appeal, and Weinberg says Drew’s case will be decided ultimately by the Illinois Supreme Court.

Currently, someone who records a police officer, prosecutor or any other member of the law enforcement community without his or her permission can be charged with a Class 1 felony.

Police interests have come out against any amendment in the eavesdropping law, saying the changes will impede their investigative powers.

But Chicago Police Supt. Garry McCarthy has come out in favor of changing the eavesdropping law. He said it is just as bad for the police as it is for citizens, because the inability to recording interactions with police makes it easier for someone to file a frivolous brutality suit.

A bill is also pending in the Illinois House of Representatives, seeking to eliminate the part of the Illinois Eavesdropping Act that bans people from making audio recordings of law enforcement personnel. The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Elaine Nekritz (D-Northbrook), passed out of a House committee by a vote of 9-2 last month.

Several other high-profile incidents stemming from the Eavesdropping Act have also made headlines and generated widespread controversy.

In August of last year, Taiwanda Moore, 20, was acquitted of a felony violation of the act, after she secretly recorded two police Internal Affairs officers while filing a sexual harassment complaint against a third officer.

Moore had said she didn’t know about the Eavesdropping Act, but her attorney argued that she was protected under an exemption to the statute that allows such recordings if someone believes a crime is being committed or is about to be committed. She argued that the officers had been stalling and bullying her.

Also in August, steelworker Tyrone Gillett says he was beaten by Chicago Police officers before being arrested for filming them attending to a disturbance at State and Madison streets. The misdemeanor charges against Gillett were dropped.

But Gillett, who is African-American, has filed a lawsuit, claiming officers “physically assaulted” him for making the cell phone recording, while just politely asking a white man who was doing the same thing to stop.

And in November of last year, Loyola journalism professor Ralph Braseth was taken into custody after videotaping the arrest of a teenage boy who jumped the turnstile at the Chicago Avenue Red Line subway stop. Breseth had been shooting for a documentary about youth from poor neighborhoods flooding the downtown area on weekends.

Braseth was released without charges, but the arresting officer erased the files on his Kodak flip camera. He later filed a complaint against the officer, claiming that videotaping an arrest from the distance was different from recording a conversation and thus did not violate the Eavesdropping Act.

  • Jim

    The only problem I see with the recording of law enforcement is that video can be taken out of context. Look at all the problems the video of Rodney King resisting arrest caused. At the same time, a video recording of the woman beater that was killed while resisting arrest or the autistic teen that rushed officers with a knife would certainly keep the whiners that cry brutality quiet!

    • dio

      that goes both ways

  • h4x354x0r

    Judges had *better* be striking down these authoritarian, police-state laws. Cops are public servants, doing a public job, the public has every right to monitor their work activities. The technology is here, and nobody – not even the cops – are going to be able to hide from it.

  • Me

    Another blow against Big Brother. They can record us without our permission, when no crime is being commited or contemptated. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

  • Chicago's Very Own

    The taxpayers pay the cops’ salaries. We have every right just as they do to record what is happening. Actions speak louder than words. Good for McCarthy that totally understands that this could harm/help depending on who is doing the abuse. Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time!! That goes for cops also!!!

  • http://1oneday.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/recording-the-police-is-necessary/ Recording the Police Is Necessary « This Day – One Day

    […] Judge Rules Against State’s Ban On Recording Police Officers (chicago.cbslocal.com) […]

  • http://www.theinformationnation.com/?p=1945 Judge Rules Against State’s Ban On Recording Police Officers « CBS Chicago | The Information Nation

    […] Judge Rules Against State’s Ban On Recording Police Officers « CBS Chicago. Posted in Big […]

  • http://1oneday.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/asking-questions-how-to-file-a-police-complaint-beware/ Asking questions how to file a police complaint BEWARE! « This Day – One Day

    […] Judge Rules Against State’s Ban On Recording Police Officers (chicago.cbslocal.com) […]

  • Bill Keene

    Like anyone cares what laws Chicago enacts. The whole country knows how corrupt the city of Chicago is, thats why only morons move there.
    The cops, lawmakers, politicians, businessmen, etc are all corrupt and evil in Chicago.
    Of course they are going to make recording the cops illegal since the cops can’t do anything without breaking the law and violating peoples rights. Of course they don’t want any justice for the innocent. This is common sense. The rest of the country knows this. This is not news.

  • Joe Mitchell

    It is ok to record all civilians when they stop them but, the police can’t be recorded. I see, its a one way street and never mind about the rights of civilians. Listen up, I do agree it could be taken out of context but that can be done whether you are a civilian or in law enforcement. Police need to be held accountable too, end of story. They still our employed and ther salaries paid by the PEOPLE!

  • http://richbrunelle.wordpress.com richbrunelle

    This is as stupid as it can get. You mean to tell me that a cop can do video on anybody in his line of sight, without that person having the right to chose not to be filmed, but a citizen cannot film police officers in the performance of their duties? How communistic can we get here? Do we get a “Miranda warning” before the cop starts rolling the tape?

    The one organization that needs to be filmed is Law Enforcement. Not because of “dirty cops” but because Stupid is running free on the streets, and regulated by our Government. The only reason not to film Law Enforcement is if they are doing wrong. What Mayor wouldn’t want to see film of his officer’s doing a good job?

    When the Government can film the Citizens and the Citizens are powerless to do the same, or better yet request they not be filmed . . . I fear the end of a free society is on the horizon. Ours!

blog comments powered by Disqus
Daily Weather Reports Delivered To You!SIGN UP NOW: Get daily weather reports every morning from meteorologist Steve Baskerville!
CBS Sports Radio RoundupGet your latest sports talk from across the country.

Listen Live